Keary,

Thanks for responding. :-)

Your answer is what I was afraid of…

If “index” only applies to characters, and therefore index 0 is the position of 
the first visible character in the TextView’s NSAttributedString, I could 
iterate through, finding the range of each cell’s characters, then jumping to 
the next index after that and asking again.

That should work, but what the heck would I pass as the textBlock pointer? 
Since a text block is exactly what I’m trying to find, I don’t have a good 
pointer to start with, do I?

—  

Charles Jenkins


On Tuesday, November 18, 2014 at 12:50, Keary Suska wrote:

> On Nov 18, 2014, at 2:38 AM, Charles Jenkins <[email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected])> wrote:
>  
> > It’s very easy to create an NSAttributedString that represents a text 
> > table, then show the table in a TextView so the user can edit information 
> > in the cells. The documentation on how to create a text table 
> > (https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/TextLayout/Articles/TextTables.html)
> >  is fairly clear.  
> >  
> > What I don’t see—and maybe it’s there but I just don’t understand it—is how 
> > to pull the table apart again. Suppose I want to grab all text from the 
> > first cell after the user has edited it. How do I do that?
>  
> -rangeOfTextBlock:atIndex: might be your best bet. The hard part is finding 
> exactly "where" you are interested in. If you are only interested in where a 
> user has edited, a delegate method may get you there, otherwise, I don't 
> know. You may need to keep meta-data about constructed tables.
>  
> HTH,
>  
> Keary Suska
> Esoteritech, Inc.
>  
>  


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected])

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to