> On Jan 30, 2015, at 7:26 AM, Trygve Inda <cocoa...@xericdesign.com> wrote: > >>> >>>> On Jan 29, 2015, at 9:44 PM, Trygve Inda <cocoa...@xericdesign.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> However, naming conventions expect copy to not >>>> be autoreleased so should the above really be: >>>> >>>> return ([copy retain]); >>> >>> Yes, if you're really still not using ARC ;-) >>> >>> —Jens >> >> I am not using ARC - this is a large project that has existed for a long >> time and I see no reason to change it. > > Just wanted to point out that you can adopt ARC on a per-file basis. Switching > back and forth between them can be a bit of a mind bender, but that may be > preferable to devoting a chunk of time to a wholesale conversion.
Do you see non-ARC code becoming obsolete? I could probably start moving it to ARC slowly but it is hard to justify time spent on something that is not really needed. I have not run into any serious bugs or unexplained crashes due to messed up retain/release. (touching wood of course). T. _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
