On Thursday 06 June 2002 03:19 pm, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > > your votes: > > > > > > Shall we remove them from 2.0.3? > > > > -1, since that is still a point-release from the original 2.0 > > IIRC, the deprecation -> removal cycle was defined on this list as > "deprecate, wait 3-4-5-6 month, remove", but was not tied to the version > numbering. > > Am I wrong?
No, you're right. My logic was thus: 2.0.2 -> 2.0.3 should be a relatively painless upgrade, mainly bugfixes, few new features. 2.0.x -> 2.1 will require some effort to adapt to new changes. Why not lump in with the 2.1 changes and remove one less (potential) hurdle in a 2.0.x -> 2.0.3 upgrade. I guess I'm more -0. The change won't impact me, but why not wait for 2.1 to impact those that will be. -pete -- peter royal -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
