Steven Noels wrote:
No, you didn't get my point. I don't want to be dense, but I think this is a very important.Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:> I think that having a machine name detached from any domain name would > help a lot both in communication and in perception of hardware > neutrality. If Nagoya was called 'e4500.sunlabs.org' I think people > would be less friendly to that, don't you think? or nagoya.betaversion.org :-D
The name of the machine is 'nagoya' and there are at least two different DNSs that point to it: 'apache.org' and 'betaversion.org' (the second being mostly for critical fail-over, nagoya acts as secondary DNS for betaversion.org but just that)
If we keep 'cocoondev.org' as the machine name and we move it to the Apache DNS, do you think people will like to have a DNS entry like
cocoondev.org.apache.org
I already hear Pierpaolo screaming *very* loud if you propose that :)
> To avoid having to explicitly indicating this to *every* ASF > individual we'll have to confront to about this (and there will be a > lot, ASF members tend to be very conservative, expecially about > infrastructural issues), I strongly suggest you give a name to that > machine and start referring to it with that name instead of with the > domain name it currently binds to. any idea? The machine name IS cocoondev.org - so if it really must be changed, I'd rather let the community decide. OTOH, nagoya's machine name hasn't much to do with apache, neither.
Neither deadalus or icarus. But you're right, we should have this community decide the name. Just let's do this after the votation is over, please. -- Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
