DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20904>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20904

XSLT processor setSystemID is not called, therefore base-uri empty

           Summary: XSLT processor setSystemID is not called, therefore
                    base-uri empty
           Product: Cocoon 2
           Version: 2.0.4
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows NT/2K
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: Other
         Component: core
        AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I have tried to use jd.xslt as the xslt processor for Cocoon. Works great in 
general except some problems with relative URI's. I mailed with the author of 
jd.xlst and he provided me with the output below.

Cocoon uses the javax.xml.transform.sax.TemplatesHandler interface to 
create Transformer-objects.
Therefore the stylesheet document is given to the XSLT processor as a SAX 
event stream.
(see org.apache.cocoon.components.xslt.XSLTProcessorImpl)
The TemplatesHandler interface has a method setSystemId() to provide the 
system id of the stylesheet before the SAX event stream is piped into the 
TemplatesHandler.
This method is not called by Cocoon which actually breaks the contract 
specified by TemplatesHandler.
In that case jd.xslt uses just the empty systemId "".
Xalan also uses the SAX locator information in case the system id is not 
provided and therefore it suceeds.

In Cocoon milestone 2.1m2 the method TemplatesHandler.setSystemId is called 
by org.apache.cocoon.components.xslt.XSLTProcessorImpl (and therfore 
jd.xslt should succeed), but XSLTProcessorImpl is deprecated in 2.1m2 and I 
don't know what is now the preferred way to invoke a Trax-XSLT processor.

Short message: Cocoon uses Trax in a non-conformant way and therefore 
jd.xslt fails.

It seems a bug to me in 2.0.4.

Reply via email to