Geoff Howard wrote: > Do we want to force people to edit cocoon.xconf to call their own business > components from the flow? I thought Stefano proposed checking for > SitemapModelComponent and disallowing it? Would that prevent looking up > a transformer, but allow looking up a legitimate component defined in > map:components? > > I'm still wanting to enable people (me!) to reuse action _code_ (not the > contract) with little re-coding of the original class file where not > necessary. If that can't be done in a clean way that doesn't invite abuse > then so be it, but I think it's worth trying for. > I just listed the solution without saying if I prefer it or not; basically I don't know which is the best, but I tend to agree with Sylvain that we should not build up a unnecessary wall. Ok, we could sheck for SitemapModelComponent but I'm not sure if this is required.
Carsten