Quoting Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> giacomo a écrit :
> >
> > On Mon, 28 May 2001, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Giacomo Pati a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > Quoting "Piroumian, Konstantin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, Cocooners!
> > > > >
> > > > > How do you feel about having a possibility to inherit action
> sets and
> > > > > extend
> > > > > them by other actions. In this case you can have one root
> action-set for
> > > > > the
> > > > > whole web application, which can include: session tracking,
> language
> > > > > selection, authorization, etc. actions. Then in every particular
> case
> > > > > the
> > > > > sub-system can add its own behavior by extending that actions
> set. E.g.:
> > > > >
> > > > > <action-set name="main">
> > > > > <act type="check-session" />
> > > > > <act type="lang-select" />
> > > > > <act type="some-other-action" />
> > > > > </action-set>
> > > > >
> > > > > Then it can be extended:
> > > > >
> > > > > <action-set name="forms" extends="main">
> > > > > <act type="form-validate" />
> > > > > <act type="navigate" />
> > > > > </action-set>
> > > > >
> > > > > <action-set name="menu" extends="main">
> > > > > <act type="menu-action" />
> > > > > </action-set>
> > > >
> > > > IIRC this is already addressed by:
> > > >
> > > > <action-set name="forms">
> > > > <act set="main"/>
> > > > <act type="form-validate" />
> > > > <act type="navigate" />
> > > > </action-set>
> > > >
> > > > This way you can controll the point where a super-set takes place
> as well.
> > > >
> > > > Giacomo
> > > >
> > > Going further on Konstantin's question : is it possible to define
> > > sitemap logicsheets that could be used to augment the sitemap syntax
> > > with higher level concerns, such as the ones proposed in the above
> > > action-sets ?
> > >
> > > There's some code in SitemapMarkupLanguage to handle
> <?xml-logicsheet?>
> > > PIs and <map:logicsheet> tags, but I've never used them. Does
> someone
> > > have some experience with this ?
> >
> > Why don't you shut your mouth :)
> >
> Sorry, but you know I like asking questions ;)
>
> > No, seriously. Yes, it is possible to use those PIs etc. because the
> > underlaying engine is the same markup-to-code as the XSP stuff uses.
> But
> > never ever ask any question about that if you'll use it and have any
> > problems with it.
> >
> > Giacomo
> >
> Mmh... Does this mean "it's not tested so who uses it debugs it" or
> "sitemap logicsheets are a bad thing" ?
Both ;) I can't stop people how are aware of it to use it but I can propose not
to use it because it was not meant to do nor is it tested.
Giacomo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
