> -----Original Message-----
> From: Donald Ball [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>
> > > > The attached patch adds the ability to specify a "target" in a
> > > > <map:redirect-to resource=""> tag. The "target" is available as "{1}"
> > > > in the resource specification.
> > >
> > > Why not as "{target}"? And why not substitutable?
> >
> > I would not say why not to use <map:parameters> as elsewhere else...
> > Like:
> > <map:match pattern="test">
> > <map:act type="form-validator">
> > <map:parameter name="descriptor" value="context:///descriptor.xml"/>
> > <map:parameter name="validate-set" value="user-input"/>
> > <map:redirect-to resource="simple-page">
> > <map:parameter name="target" value="OK"/>
> > </map:redirect-to>
> > </map:act>
> > <map:redirect-to resource="simple-page">
> > <map:parameter name="target" value="ERROR"/>
> > </map:redirect-to>
> > </map:match>
> >
> > This would be much more consistent.
>
> well, there are other sitemap components, e.g. filegenerator, which needs
> to be parameterized with the location of its datasource - and rather than
> using <map:parameter name="src" ... /> we just use a src attribute... i
> guess a rule of thumb would be that components which use a single
> parameter should use an attribute,
Originally I thought that <map:resource> may easily require more then one attribute -
that's
why <map:parameter> was suggested...
> while components which use more than
> one parameter should use map:parameter elements. but maybe we should think
> about making that a transparent choice? e.g.
>
> <map:generate type="file" src="foo"/>
>
> and
>
> <map:generate type="file">
> <map:parameter name="src" value="foo"/>
> </map:generate>
>
> would appear the same to the FileGenerator...?
But this seems like even better solution.
BTW, Is it FS or not? :)
>
> - donald
>
Vadim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
