On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> I do think that newly introduced behaviour is might be desirable in
> some cases, but I also want to have an opportunity to use previous
> one. I do propose to introduce new parameter for TraxTransformer,
> something like _useParametersValues. Other solution mught be to write
> derived transformer which would do this. Let me know which way is
> preferred.
why would it ever be desirable to use just the parameter name, but not
its value, in the cache key?
- donald
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
