Hi Team,
+1. My Vote is to go with the latest SQL Transformer in 2.1. See below for a
+description potential
problem with SQLTransformer in C2.1.
Thanks,
dims
--- Beauprez Sven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is one outstanding issue: the SQLTransformer needs a JDBC driver that
> implements at least callable statements. I don't think every DB has a driver
> with this functionality, but the question now is: Is this a drawback? I mean
> all commercial and all major open source DB's have a driver with this
> functionallity and I think the added value of the new implementation is big
> enough to consider to add the SQLTransformer to 2.0.
> I know one user who had problem with PostgreSQL, but I found a driver
> (didn't test it), which should implement the necessary functionality:
> http://jdbc.postgresql.org/
=====
Davanum Srinivas, JNI-FAQ Manager
http://www.jGuru.com/faq/JNI
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
