Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
> What if there is no <xsp:page>, i.e. you have a clean page where all XSP
> markup is inserted by logicsheets ?
You can't have XSP without the <xsp:page> element. You can't use logicsheets
without XSP. It's that simple.
Also, I do not see how your suffix selector can a) know how to test for the
filesystem extension quicly and b) be easier to use....
I am trying to get away from selectors altogether.
> IMO, having separate extensions for passive content (.xml files) and
> active content (.xsp files) is a good thing. Too much magic kills the
> confidence users have in the tool. I speak by experience, because we are
> currently redesigning some of our logicsheets so they offer a lower
> level of abstraction to their users : they were afraid to use features
> that did too much work automagically.
Yup. I don't know why, but I gues we have to live with people making
their own lives more difficult than it needs to be.
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
