On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Donald Ball wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, giacomo wrote:
>
> > The 304 code should only be set if there was a is-modified-since header
> > presented from the client (browser).
> >
> > Everything else is nonsens.
>
> that's what i thought too, and the code seems to back us up, but my
> _experience_ has been different. i was hoping to see if anyone else shared
> the same _experience_. this isn't _nonsense_, i'm trying to track down a
> bug.
To be honest, the code base has grown very quickly the last few month.
I thought that the 304 was only produced by the ResourceReader so far
but it seems that other parts of the code will produce 304 as well.
Actually I don't know which part is also producing 304 but a find/grep
should uncover those parts.
Giacomo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
