Donald Ball [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > The problem I see is that new versions of Ant can (and
> have) introduced
> > > various incompatibilities with prior versions. This
> means that all projects
> > > have to ensure that they are all using the same version
> of Ant and that they
> > > all upgrade their build projects and make a new release
> at the same time
> > > when a new build of Ant is available. (Or require
> developers to screw with
> > > switching back and forth between different Ant versions
> manually every time
> > > they want to build a different project).
>
> i think that lesson has been learned by the ant developers. ant
> development seems to have slowed quite a bit anyway as it's
> blossomed into
> a quite capable tool.
The change of pace is true for the current version, but my understanding was
that Ant 2.x would not be backward-compatible with the current 1.x series.
It's been a while since I checked on the progress of Ant 2, though...
- Sean T.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
