After comparing the logs I can now add a little to that:

When the pipeline is in the subsitemap components such as the
TraxTransformer are _retrieved_ from the pool - but they are not returned!
This is the case if the pipeline is in the "normal" sitemap.

Matthew

--
Open Source Group               sunShine - Lighting up e:Business
=================================================================
Matthew Langham, S&N AG, Klingenderstrasse 5, D-33100 Paderborn
Tel: +49-5251-1581-30   [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.sundn.de]
=================================================================


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Matthew Langham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Samstag, 28. Juli 2001 15:26
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [C2B2] Big Bug in sub-sitemap handling (?)


I think I have found a bug in the sub-sitemap handling. Unfortunately (for
me anyway) Carsten is on holiday - so maybe someone else has an idea..

I have tested memory consumption using Jprobe. From the results it seems
that pipelines in sub-sitemaps are not released from memory. This means that
after a request has been processed all the components (!) are still held in
memory. This means that repetitive requests cause the memory to fill up.

I tested the same pipeline in the normal sitemap and everything was fine.

Can someone confirm this - and maybe offer a solution (apart from not having
sub-sitemaps)?

Matthew

--
Open Source Group               sunShine - Lighting up e:Business
=================================================================
Matthew Langham, S&N AG, Klingenderstrasse 5, D-33100 Paderborn
Tel: +49-5251-1581-30   [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.sundn.de]
=================================================================



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to