On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Mariano Kamp wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I was thinking about content aggregation. We do some portal like
> aggregation of different resources. Some of them are pretty slow, like
> querying email accounts or aggregating content from different sites
> (sometimes more than a second for one <map:part>). It would be quite nice if
> the different "parts" were to be aggregated in different threads. So that if
> I put the slowest resource in the last <map:part> then the total time of the
> aggregation should be almost equal to the slowest resource but not the sum of
> all resources. Is this something planned or at least something which would be
> possible to implement?
There is nothing planned in that direction. Also your "total time of the
aggregation should be almost equal to the slowest resource" isn't really
true because of event ordering you will have to take care about when
multiple threads will fire events down the SAX pipeline.
Giacomo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]