> Giacomo Pati wrote:
>
> Quoting Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am really impressed by the changes which took effect over the
> > last weeks. Great work!
> >
> > But I am now wondering if we do the right thing. The C2.1 version
> > is now incompatible to 2.0. So I fear, that people will never use
> > the (final) 2.0 version and jump-start using 2.1 as they otherwise
> > might have to change their source code first from C1 to C2.0 and
> > afterwards to C2.1. And even if you start from scratch right now,
> > you have to ask yourself if you want to give 2.1 first a try and
> > only if things go wrong backup to 2.0.
>
> Do you mean the LogKit Management? Well, it can be configured to
> look like 2.0
> logging behaviour, no problem. But then you will not see the
> benefits of it.
>
> I wasn't able to follow closely the last few weeks and I don't
> know what changes
> you are mentioning.
>
So did I....yes, the LogKit Management is one of it, I personally would
like it in 2.0 as well. The other thing which comes to my mind is
the Source interface changes, but there might be others as well.
Carsten
> Giacomo
>
> > I know that it was me who said we should finish 2.0 and make
> > those changes only to 2.1, but after having two weeks vacation
> > with much time to think about those issues, I found it worth
> > to start this thread.
> >
> > Carsten
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
