I don't know why that excalibur version was added to 2.1.
The jar is much bigger than the official release.

But if you think that there is no important difference we can
of course revert (By the way I'm waiting for excalibur 4.0.1
release ;-) )

Carsten
> Berin Loritsch wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > cziegeler    01/09/19 03:54:57
> >
> >   Modified:    lib      Tag: cocoon_20_branch fop-0_20_1-dev.jar
> >   Added:       lib      Tag: cocoon_20_branch
> avalon-excalibur-20010911.jar
> >   Removed:     lib      Tag: cocoon_20_branch avalon-excalibur-dev.jar
> >   Log:
> >   Synched excalibur version with 2.1 and updated to latest fop
> >
> >   Revision  Changes    Path
> >   No                   revision
> >
> >
> >   No                   revision
> >
> >
> >   1.1.2.2   +1646 -2115xml-cocoon2/lib/fop-0_20_1-dev.jar
> >
> >         <<Binary file>>
> >
> >
> >   No                   revision
> >
> >
> >   No                   revision
> >
> >
> >   1.1.2.1   +0 -0      xml-cocoon2/lib/avalon-excalibur-20010911.jar
> >
> >         <<Binary file>>
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > In case of troubles, e-mail:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Excalibur 4.0 is released--there aren't any differences I am aware of
> between the released version and CVS.  Most commits that are post-release
> are to the scratchpad libraries.
>
> Please use the official version unless there is a real reason not to (like
> a serious bug fix).
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to