> Klaus Bertram wrote:
>
> Hi Carsten,
>
> I test it with the brunch and it works with attribute and without
> we can now put out the comments they are sill inside
>
Thanks for testing, but what comments do you mean? I don't see any
in the cvs version.
> i will later also test the head but i think it works also
>
Great, thanks.
Carsten
> Klaus
>
> nbis - Röttgerweg 10 - 51371 Leverkusen
> phone: +49-214-206494-0
> fax: +49-214-206494-44
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 11:24 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: AW: DIFF [C2.0] SendmailAction
> >
> >
> > I looked at the configure() method, and I think the exception
> > is thrown by the use of the getAttribute() method.
> > If the attribute "smtphost" is not set in the configuration of the
> > action, the getAttribute("smtphost") call will throw an exception!
> > So, the correct call would be:
> > getAttribute("smtphost", default-value).
> >
> > I will change the action according to the pattern above.
> > If you could please test, if this works for you?
> >
> > Carsten
> >
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: Klaus Bertram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Gesendet: Freitag, 21. September 2001 10:46
> > > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Betreff: RE: DIFF [C2.0] SendmailAction
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Carsten,
> > > every time i try to set the default value for smtphost it throws an
> > > exception
> > > also when the configuration parameter it not set.
> > >
> > > So it seems better to put out the configuration parameter
> > > it work's fine
> > >
> > > at the moment my time is a litle bit busy,
> > > but i want rewrite the sendmail action with features to send multipart
> > > mail's
> > >
> > > Klaus
> > >
> > >
> > > nbis - Röttgerweg 10 - 51371 Leverkusen
> > > phone: +49-214-206494-0
> > > fax: +49-214-206494-44
> > > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 10:18 AM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: AW: DIFF [C2.0] SendmailAction
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Klaus,
> > > >
> > > > what's the use of this patch? As far as I can tell it simply
> > > > comments the configure() method out, correct? Why this?
> > > >
> > > > Carsten
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > > Von: Klaus Bertram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. September 2001 18:09
> > > > > An: Cocoon dev
> > > > > Betreff: DIFF [C2.0] SendmailAction
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > here is an aditional diff for the SendmailAction aginst Brunch
> > > > >
> > > > > Klaus
> > > > >
> > > > > nbis - Röttgerweg 10 - 51371 Leverkusen
> > > > > phone: +49-214-206494-0
> > > > > fax: +49-214-206494-44
> > > > > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
