...this should't stop us from developing a bit further, shouldn't it?! I don't know if sub cvs is really a good idea. Why not applying new things only to the HEAD branch. That's 2 commits: C1 HEAD and C2 HEAD. That's about it. -- Torsten
> -----Original Message----- > From: John Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 7:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [patch] improved esql.xsl > > > Donald is busy at work with non-cocoon projects. I've been having a chat > with him offlist and he hopes to be back soon. (He didn't say when). > > The main problem with esql (as far as I'm concerned) is that there are _FAR_ > too many copies of it (C1 + all its branches, C2 + all its (two ;) > branches). Could we do something about shared tag libraries (sub cvs > repository ala Apache httpd2)? > > J. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, 01 October 2001 5:41 pm > > To: Torsten Curdt; Carsten Ziegeler > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [patch] improved esql.xsl > > > > > > Torsten, > > > > I looked at your patch, and although I'm not very familiar with the > > esql logicsheet, your changes seem to be in the right direction. I > > would give a +1 to them (note I'm not a committer ;-). > > > > One improvement you can probably make is to pool the EsqlConnection > > objects, so you can obtain even better performance. This may be tricky > > to do though, as each connection might be connected using a different > > user account. These are only some thoughts, it doesn't mean you have > > to implement them now. > > > > Ovidiu > > > > PS: BTW, anybody knows what happened to Donald? > > > > On Mon, 01 Oct 2001 10:58:31 +0200, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > could someone *PLEASE* have a look? > > > Thanks > > > -- > > > Torsten > > > > > > > It has been pretty quite around Donald (Donald, are you still out > > > > there ;) Christian, maybe you could have a look? > > > > > > > > We have had no problem within any old esql page so far. > > > > But we can only test it with one database (sybase ASA). > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > -- > > > > Torsten > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 8:12 AM > > > > > To: Cocoon-Dev@Xml. Apache. Org > > > > > Subject: AW: [patch] improved esql.xsl > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Team, > > > > > > > > > > could someone with more knowledge of eqsl than me > > > > > look at this patch, please? > > > > > > > > > > Carsten > > > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > > > > > > Von: Torsten Curdt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. September 2001 11:39 > > > > > > An: Carsten Ziegeler > > > > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Betreff: Re: AW: [patch] improved esql.xsl > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recreated it from the current CVS so it should be fine. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Torsten > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Torsten, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it looks like your patch is still not applied. > > > > > > > Could you please test if it works and then > > > > > > > resend the patch, so we can apply it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Carsten > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > > > > > > > > Von: Torsten Curdt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Freitag, 21. September 2001 14:08 > > > > > > > > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > Betreff: RE: [patch] improved esql.xsl > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are there any objections on this one? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Torsten > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I straightened out the latest esql.xsl logicsheet > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - removed the inner classes (created real ones) > > > > > > > > > - moved redundant code into a helper class > > > > > > > > > - added support for jdbc ResultSet positioning > > > > > > > > > (now we can do paging not only for MySQL and PostgreSQL > > > > > > > > > and it's quite easy to add more) > > > > > > > > > - added a <esql:previous-results> as counterpart of > > > > > > > > <esql:more-results> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Everything else should be same as before. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I could not test this thoroughly but it would be > > > > > > > > > great if someone could apply this to the current > > head branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Torsten > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
