Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > This is not true, the content aggregation uses sax streams and there > is no need for (re)parsing the parts. > More technical: Two pipelines: p1:[g1 -> t1 -> t2 -> s1] and p2:[g2 -> t3 -> > t4 -> s2] > and you want to aggregate them with [aggregate(p1, p2) -> t5 -> s3] > This results in: > [g1 -> t1 -> t2 \ > > t5 -> s3 > [g2 -> t3 -> t4 / > > So the serializers of the aggregated parts are ignored.
Uh, I guess I'm showing my ignorance on Cocoon2 here :) Well, what can I say. It's the day of the apologies with you, Carsten. If this is correct, then forget what I wrote above. Stefano. (ver happy to discover this) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
