Looks innocent to me. Except the part that buffering was moved from
AbstractSerializer.java into AbstractTextSerializer.java. If somebody
relied on this feature, he/she could loose buffering. That's the only
concern I have. Anything else is perfect, including bug fixing of
TextSerializer and XMLSerializer serializers.

Vadim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Morrison, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 4:29 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [PATCH] buffering serializers (was: RE: [C2]: Release
Candidate 2)
> 
> Does anybody have the experience to verify this patch?  I'll try and
find a
> little time today to ensure it works - but I'd prefer somebody else to
also
> eye ball it.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joerg Henne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, 29 October 2001 1:30 pm
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [C2]: Release Candidate 2
> >
> >
> > Carsten,
> >
> > Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > >
> > > So anything missing here?
> >
> > it would probably be a good idea to apply the patch I posted
> > a while ago (and
> > attached to this message). The patch causes a siginificant
performance
> > improvement for most serializers.
> >
> > Joerg Henne
> >
> 
> 
> 
>
=======================================================================
> Information in this email and any attachments are confidential, and
may
> not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor
disclosed
> to any third party without our permission.  There is no intention to
> create any legally binding contract or other commitment through the
use
> of this email.
> 
> Experian Limited (registration number 653331).
> Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to