On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Bernhard Huber wrote: > > > Huber Bernhard, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], homepage: > members.a1.net/berni_huber/index.html > > > > > Thank you Bernhard for working on the Velocity documentation. I've > > beenmeaning to send Carsten the patch this week like I promised, > > but you beat > > me to it! > I didn't know that, didn't read your donation email closely... > Perhaps you may add some examples? Examples helps other using > the great VelocityGenerator. > I have forgotten to add a link to the Veloctiy homepage, helps > more using Velocity under Cocoon > just suggestion... :)
Ehm... do we like people to use Velocity because of the VelocityGenerator? Definitely not! It's the same with the JSPGenerator. They are made to show people a smooth migration path over to Cocoon :) Giacomo > bye bernhard > > > > > Regards, > > > > --mike > > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Bernhard Huber wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > some documentation about cinclude, and xinclude as it is frequentyl > > > requested. > > > and i copied from javadoc docu about velocity generator. > > > docs are zipped up and attached > > > bye bernhard > > > > > > David Crossley wrote: > > > > > > >Giacomo Pati wrote: > > > > > > > >>Quoting David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> > > > >>>There are SIX DAYS TO GO until the agreed date for the > > > >>>final release. We also agreed that the date should not slip. > > > >>> > > > >>>In my opinion, 2.0 is not yet fit for release. So there is only > > > >>>one option ... hold the RT threads and get on with the job. > > > >>>--David > > > >>> > > > >>What is it you think needs to be fixed before releaseing it? > > > >>Giacomo > > > >> > > > > > > > >** Documentation, documentation, documentation > > > >- stop apologising for Cocoon 1 > > > >- positive announcement.xml and index.xml > > > >- both of those docs need a concise overiew at top > > > >(something less than half-a-page that convinces boss) > > > >- much of the documentation is old and still talks about > > > >Cocoon 1 configuration methods and issues > > > >- much documentation still has "Under construction" notices > > > >- people will turn away in droves > > > > > > > >** cocoon.xconf needs all parameters and components > > > >listed and briefly explained as internal documentation > > > > > > > >** The excellent document "How to Develop Web Applications" > > > >and the accompanying webapp.tutorial are missing from > > > >the cocoon_20_branch > > > > > > > >** Better stylesheet for xml.apache.org/cocoon2/ > > > >- the slow response of the website will not allow 2.0 to > > > >make its impact. > > > > > > > >Also the following issues are summarised at > > > >documentation/xdocs/plan/release.xml ... > > > > > > > >** We have many open bugs in bugzilla > > > >** Layout the distribution > > > >** Ensure that licensing requirements have been met > > > >** Decide what to backport from the 2.1 head > > > > > > > >--David > > > > > > > >>>-------------------------- > > > >>> > > > >>>>Subject: [C2.0] Should we set a date for 2.0 Final Release? > > > >>>>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:55:15 +0200 > > > >>>>From: Martin Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>>> > > > >>>>Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>>Ok, yes, I didnt check the calendar. Thanks for the hint! > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>As I still prefer mondays, we should set the dates to > > > >>>>>5th November: RC2 > > > >>>>>26th November: Final Release > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>yep, my +1 also for both dates, BTW: without looking to the > > > >>>>repository, do we have actualized TODO list... I mean critical > > > >>>>isuues (not including documentation) to fix ??? > > > >>>> > > > >>>-------------------------- > > > >>> > > > >>>>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:37:57 +0200 > > > >>>>From: "Carsten Ziegeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >>>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >>>> > > > >>>>you're absolutely right. It's the same problem here. > > > >>>>Due to the many changes I would propose a RC2. > > > >>>>But we still need more documentation! So a good > > > >>>>date could be 1st of November for the RC2 and > > > >>>>end of november for the final release. > > > >>>> > > > >>>>But whatever date we decide on for the final > > > >>>>release, we *should* stick to it. > > > >>>> > > > >>>>Carsten > > > >>>>Open Source Group sunShine - b:Integrated > > > >>>>================================================================ > > > >>>>Carsten Ziegeler, S&N AG, Klingenderstrasse 5, D-33100 Paderborn > > > >>>>www.sundn.de mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>>>================================================================ > > > >>>> > > > >>>>Dims wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>>Team, > > > >>>>>Should we set a date for 2.0 Final Release? (or the next > > Release> >>>>>Candidate)? Am a bit tired of > > > >>>>>hearing from people (in my organization) that we cannot switch > > > >>>>>from C1.X to C2.0 since it is in > > > >>>>>Beta/RC Cycle.... > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>Thanks, > > > >>>>>dims > > > >>>>>===== > > > >>>>>Davanum Srinivas - http://jguru.com/dims/ > > > >>>>> > > > >>> > > > >>>-------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------- > > > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>>For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------- > > ----- > > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
