Thanks, i have added your patches to both the head branch and cocoon_20_branch. A few tips for next time .. - add the word Patch to the email Subject - send diffs in preference to whole files - if there are many patches, then create a .zip or .tar.gz - see contrib.html for more tips Thanks again, Jeremy and please send more enhancements. --David
Jeremy Aston wrote: > Committers, > > I have updated the ctwig docs in line with David's comments and made them > generic. I've not bothered with @version@ et al - in the context of where > ctwig is now it is not really relevant. > > The attached files can be added back - they came from the head not the 20 > branch but it shouldn't matter. > > Change descriptions are: > ctwig-installing.xml : removed references to specific C2 versions > ctwig-why.xml : removed reference to when I installed C2 > ctwig-gettingstarted.xml - removed references to specific C2 versions > ctwig-basic01.xml - fixed example source code error where xml details not > correct > > Regards > Jeremy > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeremy Aston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 21 November 2001 16:14 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Assistance with tidy of Ctwig docs > > > Hi David, > > Absolutely. Are there any meta tags that can be used to indicate current > version? If not I will change to something more generic. > > As far as the differences go, I think another individual made some minor > changes (can't find the mail at the mo). I will check, diff and update in > the next day or so. > > Regards > > Jeremy > > David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jeremy Aston wrote: > > > > Cool > > I had said to Stefano that I would pick that up. Was going to do it in > the > next day or so but saved me a job! Anything else a new bod could > do (new to c2 mods not coding that is)? > > cheers > > jez > > Actually Jeremy, there is something very important that you > would be ideal to help with. There are a lot of mentions in ctwig > about specific version numbers of releases (e.g. 2.0rc2) hardcoded. > These need to be fixed, as the documentation should only discuss > the current release. We really should only mention specific version > numbers when absolutely neccessary, and then be prepared to > change such mentions. > > Also, i notice that the head branch and cocoon_20_branch have > differences between the ctwig docs. > regards, David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
