Matthew Langham wrote:
>
> Carsten,
>
> why don't you try it out on our Linux system????? ;-)
>
What, we have Linux system? Ups.
So, you take over some of my duty? Thanks, I will check that
out then.

Carsten

> Matthew
>
> --
> Open Source Group               sunShine - Lighting up e:Business
> =================================================================
> Matthew Langham, S&N AG, Klingenderstrasse 5, D-33100 Paderborn
> Tel:+49-5251-1581-30  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.s-und-n.de
> =================================================================
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Giacomo Pati [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Montag, 26. November 2001 14:09
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: RE: Showstoppers for 2.0 final was RE: [tale+rant] The 2.0
> syndrome and [Vote]: Final Release Date
>
>
> Quoting Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Giacomo Pati wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > >
> > > > To really get the final release out asap, we should identify all
> > > > showstoppers.
> > > > Currently entered in bugzilla are two blockers (I fixed the
> > > third one (5051)
> > > > recently).
> > > >
> > > > Here is the list from bugzilla:
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > > ID Sev Pri Plt Owner State Result Summary
> > > > 5060  Blo Oth PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW  Poorly formed
> > > filesystem URL
> > > > with file:// issues
> > > > 5063  Blo Oth Oth [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW  Distribution
> > > .war broken in
> > > > Tomcat 4
> > > >
> > > > I think, at least, #5060 is a real blocker, #5063 should be
> > > easily fixed by
> > > > changing the build scripts or adding some comments etc.
> > > >
> > > > If we can't fix 5060 very quickly, what about disabling the resolver
> > for
> > > > the final release? This would make 2.0 "block bug free". We could
> > work
> > > > on that "new" feature and make a 2.0.1 (or whatever) with a working
> > > > resolver.
> > > >
> > > > So, what do you all think about these blockers? Let's fix them
> > > and get this
> > > > great release out!
> > >
> > > Additionally I had some hours over the last weekend to find out why
> > the
> > > documentations aren't build anymore. So turning on DEBUG level in the
> > docs
> > > target where Cocoon is started to produce the docs shows that URL of
> > the
> > > form "mailto:...";, "news:..."; and "anything#somepart" gets rendered
> > and
> > > throws ResourceNotFoundExceptions which is wrong and I haven't figured
> > > what change has caused this because IIRC they had been working
> > recently.
> > >
> > > Also, on the Avalon project I think they had the same problem as they
> > have
> > > upgraded recently (Cocoon and Xalan jars).
> > >
> > > Has anybody changed the Commandline classes recently?
> > >
> > I haven't changed the cli (at least I think so) - it seems like you have
> > an
> > old version of the LinkSerializer as I added the handling of these
> > "special cases" some months ago(!). But they weren't in the initial
> > release.
> > Strange!
> >
> > What I don't get is why it's working here. Everything is fine with
> > building docs: no mailto:, no news: etc.
> >
> > I just did a fresh clean checkout, used my Windows 2k, jdk 1.3.0 and
> > typed
> > in "build docs" and voila after some time I got the whole docs without
> > any
> > problems.
> >
> > Is there something different with your configuration?
>
> Yes, the OS, it's Linux. I too made a clean checkout (and I've checked it
> more
> that once with a 'cvs diff') but 'build.sh docs' will not work.
> So I'd like
> to
> ask if other here have the same problems (I know Avalon is having problems
> with
> their docs building system based on Cocoon).
>
> Giacomo
>
> >
> > Carsten
> > > Giacomo
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to