Well, it's not exactly WYSIWYG as Java will always render a HTML page differently than the IE. For my CMS I decided for me, that - as I'm using XML/XSL - the authors should provide what they can - just data. I don't want that they can change the look of the pages besides the content. If they need another layout - it's a task for a screen designer/xslt programmer.
JOERN -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Stefan Seifert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Montag, 26. November 2001 16:44 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: XHTML WYSIWYG editing (was: Re: sharing microsoft experience) Another commercial alternative: Did you take a look at edit-on Pro 2.1 (http://www.realobjects.de). It's a really cool full wysiwyg HTML/XHTML editor applet with support for rich formatting, inline images, tables(!) and it is customizable and extensible (well, in some ways; its without source, of course). It's a JDK1.1 based applet, so runs even in older browser and has not the need of a Java2 JRE. The Support from the company is very well. We used this control in a big web-based content management system based on Cocoon 2 for editing formatted XHTML-Fragments. Stefan [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 26.11.01: > Matt Sergeant wrote: > > > > On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > > > > On Saturday 24 November 2001 12:44, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > > > . . . > > > > Should we try to bombmail mozilla's bugzilla with this feature request? > > > > > > Most probably they would appreciate code contributions better than > > > bombmailing ;-) > > > > > > But yes, such XHTML editing would be killer to have in mozilla - IMHO it > > > would be sufficient for a lot of simple content editing needs. > > > > Mozilla comes with an editor, and Zope are using this via XUL as part of > > their CMS interface. > > yes, I knew this (even if I heard the project was discontinued) but I > haven't tried it myself. > > Matt, do you know if they are able to edit just parts of the content or > the entire document was turned on for editing? > > > I doubt they'd start changing their HTML > > implementation any more than you'd advocate them changing their XML > > implementation! > > ?!? what do you mean? we are not planning to propose a change in their > HTML implementation, but just to add the ability to turn on editing mode > on an element level, like IE does. > > This shouldn't impact the rest too much and might also be useful for > them (there a few bugs about inline editing of bookmark links, tab panes > and stuff like that on XUL, maybe they already have something like this > but they didn't reply to my mail... wish they used a mail list system > instead of that stupid NNTP stuff). > > -- > Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be > able to give birth to a dancing star. > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche > -------------------------------------------------------------------- ____________________________________________________ Berufsunfähigskeitversicherung von Mamax bei WEB.DE. Jetzt informieren! http://bu.web.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
