Steven Noels wrote:
> Uh-oh. Mozilla is cool. Cocoon is cool. We want to do something CMS-like on top of
> both. Let's use Mozilla. That we have to guide a Java-centric community towards C++
> plumbing because a fellow-OSS-project is in dire need of an audience, I do not
> understand.
If you think I'm doing this because Mozilla is in need of an audience,
you didn't get my point (see below).
> > What would you do, then? a java application? a flash object?
>
> What's wrong with Java?
I want to do be able to do WYSIWYG inline editing and I need a full
browser for that (HTML + CSS + javascript). HotJava sucks. Jazilla,
well, it's dead, it's a memory hog and not compliant.
Should I write my own fully compliant java browser just to have inline
editing?
> My two scenarios are:
>
> - a Java client app, being it Swing or SWT-based that behaves and feels like a
> native OS app
> - a web-based app that unfortunately will not offer the same useability as a real
> client
>
> possible alternative would indeed be to build a client app that uses Mozilla
> technology packaged in the style of Activestate, but for this, I believe the effort
> and shift of focus warrants this *not* to be an ASF/XML-ASF/Cocoon-project.
Why do you think so?
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
