Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > 2) they admit the Cocoon 2.0 cache system is likely to provide huge > benefits for them, but they are not sure they are using it properly.
It was to monitor who does cache is working that I wrote something about "Improving StatusGenerator". I think that for each cached stream/event, we should record a creation timestamp and increment a counter each time the cached object is served. On the status page, displaying thoses values allow us to see if cache is used where it is expected to. - If nothing is listed : cache is not active. - If counter is 0 or 1 : cache is re-generated each time. -- Sébastien Koechlin - IVision - [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
