Quoting Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> > 
> <snip/>
> > >
> > > Time to introduce an idea I had recently. For now, we only have two
> > > types of map:handle-errors : 404 (ResourceNotFoundException) and 500
> > > (all other Exceptions). What about extending this to allow specific
> > > exception types to trigger specific map:handle-errors ? This would
> allow
> > > the following constructs :
> > >
> > > <map:handle-errors
> > >
> exception="org.apache.avalon.framework.configuration.ConfigurationError">
> > >   <map:act type="warn-admin-of-bad-config"/>
> > >   <map:transform src="configError2html.xsl"/>
> > >   <map:serialize type="html"/>
> > > </map:handle-errors>
> > >
> > > <map:handle-errors
> > > exception="java.lang.security.AccessControlException">
> > >   <map:transform src="ace2html.xsl"/>
> > >   <map:serialize status-code="403"/>
> > > </map:handle-errors>
> > >
> > > Thoughts ?
> > >
> > 
> > Well, in the xml of the error you have quite a lot on info you can use
> to decide what to do without changing the sitemap.
> > You could use a special selector that selects on the content of an
> "error namespace" tag to select the appropriate action, or a series of
> transformers like the log transformer (passthrough) that basically does
> the same thing.
> > I don't see the need of new semantics.
> > 
> > Nicola Ken Barozzi      These are the days of miracle and wonder...
> >                            ...so don't cry baby, don't cry
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                             Paul Simon
> 
> I'm afraid this won't work : the XML describing the error is only
> available at pipeline processing time, that is _after_ all selectors,
> actions and the like have been executed.
> 
> Also, continuing my proposal, it would be good to be able to specify the
> error notifier (the special generator for exceptions). For now it is
> hard-coded to use the Notifier which does a nice job for most
> exceptions. But we use here some smart exceptions which carry a lot of
> useful information and are XMLizable, and I'd like to be able to set the
> generator in handle-errors to process this information.

Exceptions are Exceptions. If you think you missed something add it to the 
Notifier. I'd like the idea having one Exception Schema only, don't you?

Giacomo

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to