[...Got back from vacation...] > -----Original Message----- > From: giacomo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Subject: Re: [vote] XML:DB stuff > > On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Gianugo Rabellino wrote: > > > Committers, > > > > I'd like to have your opinion about adding XML:DB stuff ad a default > > component to the HEAD version of Cocoon. Given that there's been a lot > > of talk about this API lately, and given also that Xindice is going to > > come up shortly as an Apache project, I start to think that having the > > XML:DB components compiled in by default will add visibility to this > > newcomer in the Apache XML arena and let people play with it, possibly > > contributing code. This would also avoid the risk of having sources out > > of sync with the Cocoon development since the sources would be monitored > > daily by the automatic build process. > > > > Adding the XML:DB stuff would mean adding the xmldb.jar to the lib > > directory: since the archive sums up to only 9K I don't see this as an > > issue. Of course one would still need a concrete implementation (such as > > dbXML/Xindice, eXist or Ozone) to make it work (as with JDBC) but at > > least the components would be there to play with. > > > > Let me know your opinion: here is my +1. > > +1
+1 for that! ...Next thing I would like to see is caching support and update mechanism... > > > > > Another issue, given that we would have a pseudo-protocol to work with, > > is about removing the XML:DB Generators from the code base: an XML:DB > > database can be queried as of now via a generic FileGenerator, so there > > is no need for them anymore as separate components. I don't know > > actually if there is anyone using those Generators, but if this has to > > be done I think that it should be done now. > > +1 as well given the condition that nobody use it actually. +0 Vadim > > Giacomo > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
