On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, John Morrison wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, 08 December 2001 11:44 pm > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Ant: Re: Adding XML searching with Lucene > > > > > > Bernhard Huber wrote: > > > > > >Which leads me to think that making crawling, indexing and searching as > > > >Avalon components might be FS since we're not going to use any other > > > >implementation of these.... > > > > > > > I'm sorry but what means FS? > > > > Flexibility Syndrome: when you want to do more than necessary because it > > appears cool but later on you find out it was a mistake to do it and now > > you have to support it and others are taking this even further down the > > wrong path and you can't stop them! > > > > > >What do you think? > > > > > > > I try to switch to implementing again, as there are quite some nice > > > ideas, but let's implement them.... > > > Let's continue to "work".... > > > > :) > > > > > As a result of the last emails I would summarize: > > > * Avalon components stays > > > * your naming > > > > > > org.apache.cocoon.components.crawler, and > > org.apache.cocoon.components.search are okay. It makes more > > sense, can you put some skeleton into the cvs, or send it to me? > > > > Why don't you throw in your skeleton ideas here and we discuss then in > > the open? > > > > > * I will implement some paging for the search result, if there are too > > > much search result for displaying on a single page. > > > > Yep, this is a must do. > > > > > * I will study the Main class for the internal crawling.. > > > > Great > > > > > * As I read some other mail of you; you are thinking about some more > > > indexing calculation using matrix-calculus. > > > > yes, more on this to follow soon, but for now, your indexing is good > > enough to implement the rest around it, we'll tune the indexing later on > > (even because semantic relevance rating require some deep Lucene changes > > that might not easy to get approuved, we'll see how that goes, but I'll > > keep pushing) > > > > > * I will try to write some docu, how to use the "XML Searching". > > > > nice > > > > > * First XSP is okay, a generator for the searching should be written, > > > let's call it: > > > > > > org.apache.cocoon.components.search.SearchGenerator. > > > > I'd call it > > > > org.apache.cocoon.generator.SearchGenerator > > > > that uses > > > > org.apache.cocoon.component.search.Searcher > > > > this is coherent with the rest of the system. > > > > > What about the xml output of the SearchGenerator? > > > Search Generator XML DTD, if you want it to be RDF, i have to > > read the RDF documentation more closely, the next few days..... :) > > > > Nah, forget RDF for now, let's keep it as simple as possible: > > > > searching for 'cocoon' would result in something like: > > > > <search:results> > > <search:hit rank="1" score="89%" uri="..."> > > Wouldn't rank be determined by <search:hit>'s position() within > <search:results>?
Not necessarily. Think about pagination. Giacomo > > <xhtml:p> > > <search:highlight>Cocoon</search:highlight> now offers semantic > > <search:highlight>search</search:highlight> > > </xhtml:p> > > </search:hit> > > ... > > </search:results> > > > > As you can see, this also includes part of the "context" where the > > textual information is found. This follows the Google model and I think > > it would be a *great* feature to have. > > > > But this requires more thinking, I'd say let's ignore it for now, so you > > can come up with > > > > <search:results xmlns:search="http://apache.org/cocoon/search/1.0> > > <search:hit rank="1" score="89%" uri="..."/> > > ... > > </search:results> > > > > which is good enough for now but could be easily improved later on. > > > > > I hope you don't mind making these suggestions, but after some emails i > > > get a bit confused about what should be really done. > > > > Don't worry, I love your 'hands on' attitude. It balances my 'think a > > lot and never get something done' one :) > > > > > As there is surley some need for the searching stuff in cocoon, > > let's do it. > > > > Yep. > > > > > I must admit that i have some limited time only, which i can put into > > > implementing... > > > Nevertheless i like that email&idea exchange, learning a lot... > > > > Learning is always the the fun part :) > > > > -- > > Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be > > able to give birth to a dancing star. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
