On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 10:37:46AM +0100, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > From: "Jeff Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 09:44:51AM +0100, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > From: "Jeff Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > PS, in case Ovidiu is reading: last I saw, Anteater was pretty usable. > > > > Anything happened since about a Cocoon unit testing suite? I can help > get > > > > something going.. > > > > > > Cactus? > > > > Not appropriate, I think. Cactus is for poking and testing internal > > classes running in the server. I just want to see if the pages come up > > okay (black-box testing, not white-box testing). Currently they don't. > > It would be great if Gump could alert people to this, instead of suckers > > like me ;P > > Taken from cactus site: > <include> > HttpUnit integration [..]
Cleverly combining the heaviness of Cactus (you'd still need the server-side portion, I'd bet) with the relative uselessness of HttpUnit for XML testing (it is heavily HTML-oriented). (No offense to Vincent.. I hope he's not reading;) Give me a lightweight set of Ant tasks any day :) Try it.. I bet you'd agree. http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Monitor/7464/anteater/ --Jeff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
