On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 03:14:26PM +0100, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> > I'm quite keen to learn of a better way to
> > ascertain this information and I'm open if you have any suggestions
> > about how to improve it ?
>
> The code seems to be collecting the maximum number of incoming
> concurrent requests. It might be useful, I don't know, but for sure it
> doesn't require synchronization. I mean: adding and subtracting one to a
> counter is an atomic operation (on ints, it's not on longs, but we don't
> have that many requests anyway).
>
> The non-atomic operation is the comparison with previous maximum. One
> possible simple solution is to have a sampling thread that reads that
> value and logs it someplace. It might be useful for profiling
> information.
>
> What do you think?
Ok. Sounds good to me. I'll come up with a diff over the weekend.
Thanks for your suggestions. Please feel free to offer further critique
in the future, it's much appreciated.
Cheers,
Marcus
--
.....
,,$$$$$$$$$, Marcus Crafter
;$' '$$$$: Computer Systems Engineer
$: $$$$: ManageSoft GmbH
$ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse
;$, _/\ &&:' 60327 Frankfurt Germany
' /( &&&
\_&&&&' Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&&&&. Business Hours : +49 69 9757 200
&&&&&&&:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
