Carsten, We had a VOTE sometime ago about this: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=100824080301449&w=4:
>> > I'd like to have your opinion about adding XML:DB stuff ad a default >> > component to the HEAD version of Cocoon. Given that there's been a lot >> > of talk about this API lately, and given also that Xindice is going to >> > come up shortly as an Apache project, I start to think that having the >> > XML:DB components compiled in by default will add visibility to this >> > newcomer in the Apache XML arena and let people play with it, possibly >> > contributing code. <snip/> The results are: 6 people for adding xmldb.jar, and 5 people for removing XML:DB generators, with John Morrison saying that "I *believe* people are using this...". So I guess we should proceed with adding XML:DB protocol and deprecate XML:DB generators. Does it make any sense? Regards, Vadim > -----Original Message----- > From: Gianugo Rabellino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Status of xmldb Protocol? > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > Hi Team, > > > > what's the status of the xmldb protocol currently checked into the HEAD? > > > AFAIK it's working, with some guys already using it but I'd like to have > some 3rd party review :) It's missing the XPath query part, but it's > usable to me. > > > If it is working, what about adding the protocol to the cocoon.xconf? > > > +1 for me. Though I might not be able to support it for the next few > weeks (too busy with my new job). > > Ciao, > > -- > Gianugo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
