On 21.Dec.2001 -- 11:23 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Christian Haul wrote:
> > On 20.Dec.2001 -- 12:52 PM, Durrant, Peter wrote:
> >
> > > If stored procedures are not supported in ESQL, are there any plans to add
> > > the functionality?
> >
> > Patches are welcome :-) I might look into it the other day but
> > currently there're so many things to do....
>
> Although I am quite busy, too, I would take the time if you
> come up with something decent. (maybe you could at least come up
> with a proposal for the syntax?)
Torsten, Peter,
I had a rather long car journey yesterday - good for thinking about
the problem :-) I suggest to add @direction and @typename to
<esql:parameter/> to mark out / inout parameters (and optionally
@typename for structured types) and make @type mandatory for those
parameters. The rest should be transparent i.e. no other syntax
addition would be needed. Obviously, access to out parameters would
only be possible via column number. I'm currently working on it
(almost done).
Since my laptop only has a winmodem and I develop with linux I will
only be able to upload it after my christmas vaccation.
Chris.
--
C h r i s t i a n H a u l
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fingerprint: 99B0 1D9D 7919 644A 4837 7D73 FEF9 6856 335A 9E08
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
