Berin Loritsch wrote: > Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > Berin Loritsch a écrit : > >>Maybe. The whole system is being redone, taking in lessons learned, and > >>applying cleaner implementations. That will assist in the process. BTW, > >>it isn't LogKit that is picky, it is the LogKitManager as LogKit has no > >>knowledge of reading a configuration file. > > > > _you_ are picky :) I was of course talking of LogKitManager, and to be > > even more picky, about DefaultLogKitManager ;) > > Many people complain about that with me ;P > > Seriously though, it has been ingrained in me that if you "assume" you make > an ASS out of U and ME. I work with alot of developers that have English > as a second language, so I tend to be over-explicit to remove all doubt as > to what I am talking about. It's a fault.
Please maintain that approach Berin - it is not a "fault". I too deliberately explain in detail for this same reason. I also take care not use any slang expressions or sarcasm which can easily be misunderstood. Anyway Berin, i reckon that there is another good reason for you to continue. There are various degrees of technical understanding on these discussions lists. Your clarifications help us all to better understand. (Now if only there was a way to automatically generate xdocs from the email postings :-) --David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
