Gerhard Froehlich wrote:
>
> Hi Team, Stefano,
> AFAIK we planed to re-organize our document structure,
> or is this a part of the current re-desing of xml-apache
> homepage?
I started approaching a new ToC for the docs, but found the current site
design too limiting and went to fix that first. Forrest comes from the
frustration of the 'intrinsically flat design' of the current
xml.apache.org layout and navigation structure.
But at the same time, expecting Forrest to be there at one point in the
near future (modulo my freetime) and thus having the flatness removed, I
think it would be a good thing to go ahead and think about the ToC for
the Cocoon docs.
Moreover, I thought again about the issue of URI space and I think the
proposed suggestion of using /cocoon1 and /cocoon2 and /cocoon pointing
to the last generation is the best solution.
In fact, Cocoon1 and Cocoon2 are not version indicators, but generation
identifiers and they do represent a different product, thus require a
different location.
I'm sure this makes everybody happier than my previous proposal about
/cocoon and /cocoon/old, including me this time.
Also, it would be *very* helpful for the Forrest effort to come up with
a ToC that is fully detailed but also indicates the parts that can
normally be reused across different subprojects. That would give me a
way to fix the similarities into DTDs and layout structure.
So, Gerhard, fire at will.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
