Robert Koberg wrote:
>
> I see from some archives that SM does not like dynamic sitemaps. My tool
> needs dynamic sitemaps.
Uh, uh, look, somebody is trying to ignite forking friction? :)
I don't like dynamic sitemaps and read my next mail to understand why.
Moreover, nobody ever could come up with a meaningful example that
*required* the use of a dynamic sitemap.
But maybe you can. I'm all ears.
> Would cocoon be the wrong choice?
Hey, nobody here claims that Cocoon is the tool of choice for
everything. If you like it, use it, if you don't, don't.
And if you think there is something we can fix, help us fix it.
> I mean does the
> burden of recompiling the sitemap on each update make it impractical?
Sure it does. I hate it myself!
That's exactly why we have *two* efforts underway to reduce the 'sitemap
try/test/retry' cycle faster (Sylvain's and Ovidiu's). Checkout the
'scratchpad' directory in CVS.
Look, I *love* when I am proven wrong since that's the moment I can
learn something.
But sparkling friction is not exactly the way I consider 'costructive' a
critic to be.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
