Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: >> Again, I don't want to be harsh
> Doesn't seem [;-)] Now Ken, let's try to set things straight: I was already replying to John's email with a solid +1 when your email came through stating that we would be better giving CVS access to the POI guys or, given the attitude of developers and the activities needed to care this baby, we would have been blasted "daily" by "lots of patches". This rang a bell in my head: I do think that POI support would be a great addition to Cocoon (and, BTW, one of my main interests in this community has been and still is integration of new and interesting technologies in Cocoon, e.g. JFOR and XML:DB), but I was worried reading from your emails that, while the real one to blame is MS and not the POI team, POI needs continous care and feeding. Now, this is Cocoon development and I'm more than happy in having Cocoon leverage new and useful technologies like POI. But this doesn't mean that development of such technologies should happen in the Cocoon CVS. :-) Anyway, Stefano just gave me the reply I wanted, so I'm perfectly happy, here is another +1 just in case, and this is over :) Ciao, -- Gianugo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
