On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > >
<snip/> > > Does anybody know the answer to the mystery of why > > the FAQ DTD lost some excellent functionality? See > > discussion below. I propose that if nobody knows, then > > we should resort to the FAQ document structure of C1. > > David, > > DTDs are like OS or text editors: highly subjective to personal taste. :-) > At the same time, it's fairly easy to transform Documentation DTD into > Docbook DTD so I plan to do: Avalon already does so. We can borrow those XSLTs to do so. > light semantic markup -> full semantic markup -> presentation markup > > where > > light content DTD -> Documentation v1.1 (and friends) > full content DTD -> Docbook (latest) > presentation DTD -> XHTML, XSL:FO (rendered as PDF) and SVG (rendered > as PNG) > > What do you think? Make sense to me. Giacomo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
