Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
<snip/>
> > The first step should be for you to add some more "Additional
> > Comments" into Bugzilla to give me a list of the relevant
> > "attach_id"s. I see that some are now not relevant, so you
> > can tell me which to use. (You could of course tell me in
> > email, but we need to complete the document trail in Bugzilla.)
> 
> The relevant ones are always only the last. As requested in the
> submission guidelines, changes to patches must result in
> completely new patches, so every submission invalidates the
> previous. You are right, I will specify it more clearly next time.

Ah, i see. It is my mis-understanding. Thanks.

> There are many versions also because the patch must run
> agains the current CVS, and since build.xml has been changed
> a lot lately, I got conflicts daily, so I resubmitted every time.

Yes Cocoon is a seriously active project and build.xml is an
everchanging file. If you can manage to get your patch into
the layout that Carsten suggested during your "today" then i
should be able to get it into CVS during Australian "tomorrow".
--David


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to