Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > David Crossley wrote: <snip/> > > The first step should be for you to add some more "Additional > > Comments" into Bugzilla to give me a list of the relevant > > "attach_id"s. I see that some are now not relevant, so you > > can tell me which to use. (You could of course tell me in > > email, but we need to complete the document trail in Bugzilla.) > > The relevant ones are always only the last. As requested in the > submission guidelines, changes to patches must result in > completely new patches, so every submission invalidates the > previous. You are right, I will specify it more clearly next time.
Ah, i see. It is my mis-understanding. Thanks. > There are many versions also because the patch must run > agains the current CVS, and since build.xml has been changed > a lot lately, I got conflicts daily, so I resubmitted every time. Yes Cocoon is a seriously active project and build.xml is an everchanging file. If you can manage to get your patch into the layout that Carsten suggested during your "today" then i should be able to get it into CVS during Australian "tomorrow". --David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]