People, What's your opinion on adding size() method to the Store interface? Currently method of getting store size by enumerating through all store items employed in MRUMemoryStore does not fill me with optimism... ahem...
Another - related to this - question: What classes are considered "Cocoon public API", the ones which have frozen (since beta) interface? What classes are "Cocoon Internals", where interface could be changed? Vadim > From: Gerhard Froehlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] <huge snip> > >> Hava you considered a sort of binary approach to emptying stores? > >> > >> while (MemoryIsLow) { > >> free half of the items in the next store > >> run gc > >> } > > > >I guess half would be too radical :) > >May be something like 1/10th (decimal approach) would do the job better? > > Everything no problem *if* the Store interface would have a method like > <code>int size()</code>. But it doesn't provide this in the moment. And we > all no how people react, when we change a work interface. But I can change > the implementation of <code>Enumeration keys()</code> and determine so the > size elements in the store. That would be possible. > > 1/10 I like. Half is a little bit <german>krass</german>. Think about that > chain picture Stefano drawed. > > Gerhard > > -------------------------------------------- > Very funny, Scotty. Now beam down my clothes. > --------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
