Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: >The more I think about it, the more I believe that namespaced javadocs >following the XML model are overwelming. > >I mean: namespaces were developped to allow markups to cross. FO with >SVG figures. XSLT with XHTML templates, etc... > >Are we *ever* going to cross javadoc tags in our source code? > >I don't see how. > >So, I think that something like this > > /** > * @avalon:role blah > * @cocoon:component action > * @xxx:yyy string name="value" name="value" name="\"value\"" > */ > >is enough. (the @namespace:cocoon URI is too much). > >comments? > Yes, this should be enough.
And if one day prefixed javadoc tags have a worldwide success that causes name clashes, we will still have the ability to add @namespace:xxx and default URIs for "legacy" prefixes :) Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies - http://www.anyware-tech.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
