On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> > This is not a showstopper and may not even be an issue for us.
> > However, i noticed that many of the licences have strange
> > dates. Most of them say "1999" and only a couple of them say
> > "2002".
>
> We just include the licenses that they ship. This is not our problem.
Ack.
> > Also the main legal/LICENSE file has Ant replacement
> > tag for @year@
>
> Well, this is a little too far. We should change this to a valid year
> (2002) seems reasonable)
You can change the year - if you change the file for the first time that
year. You could even work out a script. It is also very common to have a
range. But I would not sweat over it. And certainly would agree that using
@year@ gives a bit too much to control to automation.. which is likely to
increase the chance of getting it wrong. (I.e the case where you have a
project which was totally stagnant for 5 years - i.e. not code commits -
and yeat mentions the 2002 in a (c).).
Dw.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
