Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: >Sylvain Wallez wrote: > >>Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> >>>But two minor things with your check-in: >>>a) Please add the licence header next time to the source when you check-in >>> >>Carsten, why is the full Apache license needed in each source file ? Did >>I miss something about this ? >> >Because otherwise our code is not legally protected from the current >Apache license. > >>This makes the mouse wheel roll and roll to go down to the code ;) >> >We are fully aware of this, the Apache Licensing Committee has been >working on an Apache License 2.0 which takes care of this and you can >simply place a placeholder instead of the full text (just like the GPL, >for example) > >But legal stuff is *way* slower than code around the ASF :) > DOM4J has an interesting solution : the full license (Apache-like) is placed at the bottom of each source file and at the top there's a simple header with a copyright notice and a "See the bottom of this file for the licence".
-- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies - http://www.anyware-tech.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
