On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, DZIEMBOWSKI,KINGA (HP-NewJersey,ex2) wrote: > > > > > > So, Vadim, why are they there? > > > > To show off the possibility ;) > > There was concern raised: lots of "org.apache.cocoon....." in > > sitemap.xmap scares newbies away, and I kind of agree with this > > statement (remembering these days when had a look at (IIRC) Jetspeed > > configuration) > > > > So we need to come to some conclusion on this and (may be) > > move most of > > the standard components into cocoon.xconf. This will allow us to have > > clean sitemap.xmap. > > > > Vadim > > I do prefer to register Adapter components in the cocoon.xconf. The Adapter > components are not part of the pipeline definition and it is better to > register them in cocoon.xconf rather than in sitemap. > Please somebody confirm that components registered in the cocoon.xconf got > this same "treatment" as those from sitemap. Configuration etc.
Yes, they got configurations, but they will not be setup like sitemap component (means no objectModel, Resolver, etc.). Giacomo > > Done deal. > > Let's return to the HttpRequest/Request discussion. > > Kinga > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
