Hi! > Please elaborate more. I don't see what a transformer > isn't able to do in the current implementation.
I've been talking that it _can_ do almost the same thing that a symmetric serializer is expected to do, i.e. we can save response to disk, send something somewhere and do virtually anything else in transformer. We don't need specific serializer for that. > But I don't see how this is related to the Subject > "[RT] Cocoon Symmetry". I mean that we [xml/cocoon addicts :)] _already have_ functionality of symmetric serializer via use of transformers, the only deviation is that we still need to wait for some response after request. And this is good since it allows to keep track of request results. That's the point of special symmetric serializer ? Mikhail --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
