On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > From: Torsten Curdt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > <snip/> > > > > Thus I propose to have > > > > > > <map:pipeline-fragments> > > > <map:pipeline-fragment name="action-set-foo"> > > > <!-- anything that is allowed to be in a pipeline --> > > > </map:pipeline-fragment> > > > <!-- more fragments --> > > > </map:pipeline-fragments> > > > > > > with > > > > > > <map:match ....> > > > <!-- ... --> > > > <map:use-fragment name="action-set-foo"/> > > > <!-- ... --> > > > </map:match> > > > > Indeed this would be cool. Right now we are using XML entities for > that. > > Auuuah - ugly ;) > > To me this looks very familiar... It reminds me of resources. Shouldn't > be then resources tinkered with instead of adding the whole new concept > of fragments?
True! -- Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
