> From: Jeremy Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > At 2:00 pm -0500 15/2/02, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > >> From: Jeremy Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > ><snip/> > > > >> >Question #2: do you check if the <xfwt:write> element includes *one* > >> >and > >> >only *one* nested element? If not, we could end up with problems > >> >later on. > > > >Wait, why such a limitation? What if you want to write few files, not > >one? The result modes of the transformer might be: > > - exception in case of error, > > - <xfwt:result/> tag > > > > > >> No I don't, I'll add that to my list, thanks. > > > >Please reconsider this addition :) > > I thought he meant something different .... > > ie. make sure the document you make, cannot have more than one root by > mistake.
Oops! My bad :) > Not, make sure there is only one <xfwt> tag in the whole stream. > > I'd like to be able to modify more than one file at once if required as well. Cool. <snip/> > >> Which is the right way to go do you think? > > > >I think there is no need (and may be even harm) to have xfwt namespace > >declared needlessly. > > > Unless I am to buffer the whole document before Serializing it, I do not > understand how I can tell that the part I am Serializing to file is going > to have something in the xfwt namespace before I have to start prefix > mapping. Hm. May be then leave this namespace; better way to handle this may arise later, after some usage of transformer. Vadim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
