Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > > From: Theodore W. Leung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Ok, > > > > I've looked in legal, but I don't agree that the licenses are all > sorted > > out. In particular: > > > > The license for Jimi doesn't allow us to distribute it.
Oh, right, forgot about that: we don't need Jimi directly, it's a FOP dependency. What are they doing with it? > > The License for Jisp covers source but not binary distribution > > Regarding JISP: > > http://www.coyotegulch.com/jisp/#License: > --------------8<-------------- > Scott's Very Free License > > The following license applies to the entire Jisp package, and is > included in jisp_1_0_2_distro.jar and all source files contained > therein: > --------------8<-------------- > > Does this resolve the issue? Should this be mentioned in the license > itself? I don't see any problems with JISP. -- Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth to a dancing star. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche -------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
