> >> > single class) should we adopt the code in out codebase? As much as I hate > duplicate code I also like to see this functionality! > << > +1 > > We definately need something like this. I suggest we go for the duplicate > code as it would seem from your message that this is the only way..?
Since there was -1 for including this class into Framework or Excalibur :( the only alternative would be to include the cornerstone.jar. But IMHO this doesn't make much sense because of a single class! (We already ship with a bunch of jars) ...soooo... yes I guess duplicate code is the only way to get this thing going... -- Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
